TY - JOUR
T1 - On the integrality gap of degree-4 sum of squares for planted clique
AU - Hopkins, Samuel B.
AU - Kothari, Pravesh
AU - Henry Potechin, Aaron
AU - Raghavendra, Prasad
AU - Schramm, Tselil
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 ACM.
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - The problem of finding large cliques in random graphs and its “planted” variant, where one wants to recover a clique of size ω log (n) added to an Erdős-Rényi graph G ∼ G(n,1 2 ), have been intensely studied. Nevertheless, existing polynomial time algorithms can only recover planted cliques of size ω = Ω(n). By contrast, information theoretically, one can recover planted cliques so long as ω log (n). In this work, we continue the investigation of algorithms from the Sum of Squares hierarchy for solving the planted clique problem begun by Meka, Potechin, and Wigderson [2] and Deshpande and Montanari [25]. Our main result is that degree four SoS does not recover the planted clique unless ω n/ polylog n, improving on the bound ω n1/3 due to Reference [25]. An argument of Kelner shows that the this result cannot be proved using the same certificate as prior works. Rather, our proof involves constructing and analyzing a new certificate that yields the nearly tight lower bound by “correcting” the certificate of References [2, 25, 27].
AB - The problem of finding large cliques in random graphs and its “planted” variant, where one wants to recover a clique of size ω log (n) added to an Erdős-Rényi graph G ∼ G(n,1 2 ), have been intensely studied. Nevertheless, existing polynomial time algorithms can only recover planted cliques of size ω = Ω(n). By contrast, information theoretically, one can recover planted cliques so long as ω log (n). In this work, we continue the investigation of algorithms from the Sum of Squares hierarchy for solving the planted clique problem begun by Meka, Potechin, and Wigderson [2] and Deshpande and Montanari [25]. Our main result is that degree four SoS does not recover the planted clique unless ω n/ polylog n, improving on the bound ω n1/3 due to Reference [25]. An argument of Kelner shows that the this result cannot be proved using the same certificate as prior works. Rather, our proof involves constructing and analyzing a new certificate that yields the nearly tight lower bound by “correcting” the certificate of References [2, 25, 27].
KW - Planted clique
KW - Random matrices
KW - Sum of Squares method
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052591350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052591350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3178538
DO - 10.1145/3178538
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85052591350
SN - 1549-6325
VL - 14
JO - ACM Transactions on Algorithms
JF - ACM Transactions on Algorithms
IS - 3
M1 - 28
ER -