Abstract
Conventional analyses of labor market fluctuations ascribe a minor role to labor force participation. We show, by contrast, that flows-based analyses imply that the participation margin accounts for around one-third of unemployment fluctuations. A novel stock-flow apparatus establishes these facts, delivering three further contributions. First, the role of the participation margin appears robust to adjustments for spurious transitions induced by reporting error. Second, conventional stocks-based analyses are subject to a stock-flow fallacy, neglecting offsetting forces of worker flows on the participation rate. Third, increases in labor force attachment among the unemployed during recessions are a leading explanation for the role of the participation margin.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 64-82 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Journal of Monetary Economics |
| Volume | 72 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 1 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics
Keywords
- Business cycles
- Labor force participation
- Unemployment
- Worker flows