On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts

Daniel N. Osherson; Edward E. Smith

doi:10.1016/0010-0277(81)90013-5

On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts

Daniel N. Osherson, Edward E. Smith

Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

417 Scopus citations

Abstract

Prototype theory construes membership in a concept's extension as graded, determined by similarity to the concept's "best" exemplar (or by some other measure of central tendency). The present paper is concerned with the compatibility of this view of concept membership with two criteria of adequacy for theories of concepts. The first criterion concerns the relationship between complex concepts and their conceptual constituents. The second concerns the truth conditions for thoughts corresponding to simple inclusions.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	35-58
Number of pages	24
Journal	Cognition
Volume	9
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(81)90013-5
State	Published - 1981

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Language and Linguistics
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Linguistics and Language
Cognitive Neuroscience

Access to Document

10.1016/0010-0277(81)90013-5

Cite this

@article{ab618cfe615846b0b038f4c9e4b64083,

title = "On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts",

abstract = "Prototype theory construes membership in a concept's extension as graded, determined by similarity to the concept's {"}best{"} exemplar (or by some other measure of central tendency). The present paper is concerned with the compatibility of this view of concept membership with two criteria of adequacy for theories of concepts. The first criterion concerns the relationship between complex concepts and their conceptual constituents. The second concerns the truth conditions for thoughts corresponding to simple inclusions.",

author = "Osherson, {Daniel N.} and Smith, {Edward E.}",

year = "1981",

doi = "10.1016/0010-0277(81)90013-5",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "9",

pages = "35--58",

journal = "Cognition",

issn = "0010-0277",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts

AU - Osherson, Daniel N.

AU - Smith, Edward E.

PY - 1981

Y1 - 1981

N2 - Prototype theory construes membership in a concept's extension as graded, determined by similarity to the concept's "best" exemplar (or by some other measure of central tendency). The present paper is concerned with the compatibility of this view of concept membership with two criteria of adequacy for theories of concepts. The first criterion concerns the relationship between complex concepts and their conceptual constituents. The second concerns the truth conditions for thoughts corresponding to simple inclusions.

AB - Prototype theory construes membership in a concept's extension as graded, determined by similarity to the concept's "best" exemplar (or by some other measure of central tendency). The present paper is concerned with the compatibility of this view of concept membership with two criteria of adequacy for theories of concepts. The first criterion concerns the relationship between complex concepts and their conceptual constituents. The second concerns the truth conditions for thoughts corresponding to simple inclusions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019526601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019526601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0010-0277(81)90013-5

DO - 10.1016/0010-0277(81)90013-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 7196818

AN - SCOPUS:0019526601

SN - 0010-0277

VL - 9

SP - 35

EP - 58

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

IS - 1

ER -

On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this