Abstract
When it comes to evaluating our own abilities and prospects, most (non-depressed) people are subject to a distorting bias. We think that we are better - friendlier, more well-liked, better leaders, and better drivers - than we really are. Once we learn about this bias, we should ratchet down our self-evaluations to correct for it. But we don't. That leaves us with an uncomfortable tension in our beliefs: we knowingly allow our beliefs to differ from the ones that we think are supported by our evidence. We can mitigate the tension by waffling between two belief states: a reflective state that has been recalibrated to take into account our tendency to overrate ourselves, and a non-reflective state that has not.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 115-124 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Philosophical Studies |
Volume | 123 |
Issue number | 1-2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2005 |
Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy