TY - JOUR
T1 - Oceanic ventilation and biogeochemical cycling
T2 - Understanding the physical mechanisms that produce realistic distributions of tracers and productivity
AU - Gnanadesikan, Anand
AU - Dunne, John P.
AU - Key, Robert M.
AU - Matsumoto, Katsumi
AU - Sarmiento, Jorge Louis
AU - Slater, Richard D.
AU - Swathi, P. S.
PY - 2004/12
Y1 - 2004/12
N2 - Differing models of the ocean circulation support different rates of ventilation, which in turn produce different distributions of radiocarbon, oxygen, and export production. We examine these fields within a suite of general circulation models run to examine the sensitivity of the circulation to the parameterization of subgridscale mixing and surface forcing. We find that different models can explain relatively high fractions of the spatial variance in some fields such as radiocarbon, and that newer estimates of the rate of biological cycling are in better agreement with the models than previously published estimates. We consider how different models achieve such agreement and show that they can accomplish this in different ways. For example, models with high vertical diffusion move young surface waters into the Southern Ocean, while models with high winds move more young North Atlantic water into this region. The dependence on parameter values is not simple. Changes in the vertical diffusion coefficient, for example, can produce major changes in advective fluxes. In the coarse-resolution models studied here, lateral diffusion plays a major role in the tracer budget of the deep ocean, a somewhat worrisome fact as it is poorly constrained both observationally and theoretically.
AB - Differing models of the ocean circulation support different rates of ventilation, which in turn produce different distributions of radiocarbon, oxygen, and export production. We examine these fields within a suite of general circulation models run to examine the sensitivity of the circulation to the parameterization of subgridscale mixing and surface forcing. We find that different models can explain relatively high fractions of the spatial variance in some fields such as radiocarbon, and that newer estimates of the rate of biological cycling are in better agreement with the models than previously published estimates. We consider how different models achieve such agreement and show that they can accomplish this in different ways. For example, models with high vertical diffusion move young surface waters into the Southern Ocean, while models with high winds move more young North Atlantic water into this region. The dependence on parameter values is not simple. Changes in the vertical diffusion coefficient, for example, can produce major changes in advective fluxes. In the coarse-resolution models studied here, lateral diffusion plays a major role in the tracer budget of the deep ocean, a somewhat worrisome fact as it is poorly constrained both observationally and theoretically.
KW - Biogeochemical cycles
KW - Particle export
KW - Vertical exchange
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=15944377805&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=15944377805&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2003GB002097
DO - 10.1029/2003GB002097
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:15944377805
SN - 0886-6236
VL - 18
SP - 1
EP - 17
JO - Global Biogeochemical Cycles
JF - Global Biogeochemical Cycles
IS - 4
ER -