Oceanic uptake of anthropogenic CO2: The major uncertainties

Jorge Louis Sarmiento

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations


The recent notes by Broecker [1991] and by Smith and Mackenzie [1991] rightfully point out that many oceanographers do not have a clear grasp of the relationship between the oceanic biological pump and anthropogenic CO2 transient. This misunderstanding has unfortunately led some scientists to make misleading claims as to the importance of the biological pump in the anthropogenic transient. It is remarkable that someone who contributed as much to our understanding of the oceanic carbon cycle as Revelle could have incorrectly stated that the biological pump takes up anthropogenic CO2 [Revelle, 199O]. However, both notes go too far when they dismiss the biological pump as being of minimal relevance to global change, with a particular indictment by Broecker of the Joint Global Ocean Flux Study (JGOFS) as having been guilty of “tarnishing the integrity of global change research” by “hitching their wagons to the greenhouse star.”

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)309-313
Number of pages5
JournalGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1991

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • General Environmental Science
  • Atmospheric Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Oceanic uptake of anthropogenic CO2: The major uncertainties'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this