Objectifying Women’s Bodies is Acceptable from an Intimate Perpetrator, at Least for Female Sexists

María Lameiras-Fernández, Susan T. Fiske, Antonio González Fernández, José F. Lopez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectification of the female body is generating much research. Nevertheless, this has revealed little about whether women’s evaluations depend on the level of psychological intimacy with the perpetrator of that objectification. Intimacy theory predicts that objectifying comments would seem more acceptable coming from a close partner, especially for sexist women. The present study begins to fill these gaps by analyzing responses from 301 heterosexual/bisexual adult women in the United States (Mage = 37.02, range = 18–72) to appearance and sexual body comments made by four different male perpetrators: strangers, colleagues, friends, or partners. Measures assessed women’s perceptions of objectification, as well as reported enjoyment of these comments. As long as they were not negative, comments from heterosexual partners were perceived as the least objectifying and enjoyed the most; comments from colleagues, strangers, and friends were linked with greater objectification and less enjoyment. Additionally, sexist attitudes toward men and women—but more clearly toward men—linked with objectification and enjoyment. Future research directions and practical implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)190-205
Number of pages16
JournalSex Roles
Volume79
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gender Studies
  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Keywords

  • Body image
  • Heterosexuality
  • Objectification
  • Romantic relationship
  • Sexual harassment
  • Sexualization

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Objectifying Women’s Bodies is Acceptable from an Intimate Perpetrator, at Least for Female Sexists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this