No Testimonial Route to Consensus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations


The standard image of how consensus can be achieved is by pooling evidence and reducing if not eliminating disagreements. But rather than just pooling substantive evidence on a certain question, why not also take into account the formal, testimonial evidence provided by the fact that a majority of the group adopt a particular answer? Shouldn't we be reinforced by the discovery that we are on that majority side, and undermined by the discovery that we are not? Shouldn't this be so, in particular, when Condorcet's jury theorem applies? It turns out not. There are serious problems attending any strategy of majoritarian deference.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)156-165
Number of pages10
Issue number3
StatePublished - Oct 2006

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History and Philosophy of Science


Dive into the research topics of 'No Testimonial Route to Consensus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this