Nitrogen loss from unpolluted South American forests mainly via dissolved organic compounds

Steven S. Perakis, Lars O. Hedin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

569 Scopus citations

Abstract

Conceptual1-4 and numerical5-8 models of nitrogen cycling in temperate forests assume that nitrogen is lost from these ecosystems predominantly by way of inorganic forms, such as nitrate and ammonium ions. Of these, nitrate is thought to be particularly mobile, being responsible for nitrogen loss to deep soil and stream waters. But human activities- such as fossil fuel combustion, fertilizer production and land-use change- have substantially altered the nitrogen cycle over large regions9, making it difficult to separate natural aspects of nitrogen cycling from those induced by human perturbations10. Here we report stream chemistry data from 100 unpolluted primary forests in temperate South America. Although the sites exhibit a broad range of environmental factors that influence ecosystem nutrient cycles11-13 (such as climate, parent material, time of ecosystem development, topography and biotic diversity), we observed a remarkably consistent pattern of nitrogen loss across all forests. In contrast to findings from forests in polluted regions, streamwater nitrate concentrations are exceedingly low, such that nitrate to ammonium ratios were less than unity, and dissolved organic nitrogen is responsible for the majority of nitrogen losses from these forests. We therefore suggest that organic nitrogen losses should be considered in models of forest nutrient cycling, which could help to explain observations of nutrient limitation in temperate forest ecosystems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)416-419
Number of pages4
JournalNature
Volume415
Issue number6870
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 24 2002

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nitrogen loss from unpolluted South American forests mainly via dissolved organic compounds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this