News from the other side: How topic relevance limits the prevalence of partisan selective exposure

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

68 Scopus citations

Abstract

Prior research has demonstrated a preference among partisans for like-minded news outlets, a key mechanism through which the media may be polarizing Americans. But in order for source reputations to cause widespread selective exposure, individuals must prioritize them above other competing attributes of news content. Evaluating the relative in-fluence of various contributors to media choice is therefore critical. This study pits two such factors, source reputation and topic relevance, against one another in conjoint survey experiments offering randomly paired news items to partisans. Making a news source's reputation politically unfriendly lowers the probability that an individual chooses an item, but this negative effect is often eclipsed by the positive effect of making a news topic relevant to the individual. In many popular modern news consumption environments, where consumers encounter a diverse mixture of sources and topics, the ability of source reputations to contribute to polarization via partisan selective exposure is limited.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)763-773
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume78
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2016
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'News from the other side: How topic relevance limits the prevalence of partisan selective exposure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this