Naïve no more: Foreign direct investment screening in the European Union

Sarah Bauerle Danzman, Sophie Meunier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


This paper asks what explains the creation and comparative features of national Investment Screening Mechanisms (ISMs) in Europe. After providing a brief history and definition of ISMs, we provide descriptive patterns about the similarities and differences in the investment screening features of national ISMs in EU member states. We then explain differences in national screening policies by focusing on the role of public debt, Chinese investment, R&D expenditures and various geographic groupings. Finally, we make three policy arguments about the rise of ISMs in Europe: (1) ISMs have not been designed as protectionist instruments, (2) the politics of inward investment screening reflects a shift from economic to security logic in addressing the fundamental tension between the benefits and vulnerabilities of open markets and (3) the EU can use the ‘commercialisation’ of security to extend its own competence in the security sphere. We conclude by considering how the rapid expansion of investment screening in Europe could affect economic openness, as well as the role of the EU as a global actor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)40-53
Number of pages14
JournalGlobal Policy
Issue numberS3
StatePublished - Jul 2023

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Naïve no more: Foreign direct investment screening in the European Union'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this