Abstract
We consider parametric examples of symmetric two-bidder private value auctions in which each bidder observes her own private valuation as well as noisy signals about her opponent's private valuation. We show that, in such environments, the revenue equivalence between the first and second price auctions (SPAs) breaks down and there is no definite revenue ranking; while the SPA is always efficient allocatively, the first price auction (FPA) may be inefficient; equilibria may fail to exist for the FPA. We also show that auction mechanisms provide different incentives for bidders to acquire costly information about opponents' valuation.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-30 |
Number of pages | 30 |
Journal | Journal of Economic Theory |
Volume | 126 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 2006 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Economics and Econometrics
Keywords
- Allocative efficiency
- Information acquisition
- Multidimensional auctions
- Revenue equivalence