Abstract
Anderson's theory is plausible and largely consistent with the data. However, it remains underspecified on several fronts, and we highlight areas for potential improvement. Reuse is described as duplicating a functional component, preserving one function and tinkering to add another function. This is a promising model, but Anderson neglects other reasonable alternatives and we highlight several. Evidence cited in support of reuse fails to uniquely support it among a broader set of multi-use theories. We suggest that a more stringent criterion for direct support of reuse may be satisfied by focusing on previous adaptive functions (original use).
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 277-278 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Aug 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Physiology
- Behavioral Neuroscience