Abstract
Does it ever happen that there are things we shouldn’t do and the reasons we shouldn’t do them are moral reasons, yet doing them is not morally wrong? Sur-prisingly, yes. I argue for a category that has not been recognized by moral the-orists: morally permissible moral mistakes. Sometimes (but far from always) a su-pererogatory action is the thing a person should do in failing to act, one makes a morally permissible moral mistake. Recognizing the category of morally permis-sible moral mistakes solves a puzzle about supererogation, expands the universe of possible moral views, and shows some apparently inconsistent moral views to be consistent.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 366-393 |
Number of pages | 28 |
Journal | Ethics |
Volume | 126 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 2016 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy