Abstract
Moral dilemmas engender conflicts between two traditions: consequentialism, which evaluates actions based on their outcomes, and deontology, which evaluates actions themselves. These strikingly resemble two distinct decision-making architectures: a model-based system that selects actions based on inferences about their consequences; and a model-free system that selects actions based on their reinforcement history. Here, I consider how these systems, along with a Pavlovian system that responds reflexively to rewards and punishments, can illuminate puzzles in moral psychology.
| Translated title of the contribution | Models of morality |
|---|---|
| Original language | Portuguese |
| Pages (from-to) | 143-152 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Revista Brasileira de Politicas Publicas |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Public Administration
Keywords
- Consequentialism ethic
- Decision making
- Deontology ethic
- Moral dilemmas
- Morality
- Pavlovian system
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Models of morality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver