Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Princeton University Home
Help & FAQ
Link opens in a new tab
Search content at Princeton University
Home
Profiles
Research units
Facilities
Projects
Research output
Press/Media
Mixed-mode fatigue crack growth using cohesive zone modeling
Habeun Choi
, Kyoungsoo Park
,
Glaucio H. Paulino
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
27
Link opens in a new tab
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Mixed-mode fatigue crack growth using cohesive zone modeling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Fatigue Crack Growth Rate
100%
Traction-separation Relations
100%
Cohesive Zone Modeling
100%
Mixed Mode Crack Growth
100%
Damage Measure
100%
Model Constant
50%
Computational Simulation
50%
Fracture Surface
50%
Local Stress
50%
Computational Results
50%
Physical Condition
50%
Zone-based
50%
Loading-unloading
50%
Traction Stress
50%
Fatigue Damage
50%
Three-point Bending Test
50%
Total Failure
50%
Crack Closure
50%
Fatigue Crack Growth
50%
Cohesive Zone
50%
Separation Rate
50%
Load to Failure
50%
Contact Condition
50%
Double Cantilever Beam Test
50%
Crack Tip Behavior
50%
Nonlinear Crack
50%
Fracture Potential
50%
Normal Contact
50%
Contact Failure
50%
Mode I Testing
50%
Mixed-mode Bending Test
50%
Simple Mode
50%
Five-stage
50%
Cohesive Traction
50%
Fatigue Loading
50%
Test Double
50%
Engineering
Mixed Mode
100%
Cohesive Zone
100%
Fatigue Crack Growth
100%
Model Constant
20%
Fracture Surface
20%
Local Stress
20%
Crack Tip
20%
Fatigue Damage
20%
Crack Face
20%
Crack Closure
20%
Contact Condition
20%
Double Cantilever Beam Test
20%
Three-Point Bending Test
20%
Cohesive Traction
20%
Mixed-Mode Bending
20%
Bending Tests
20%
Fatigue Loading
20%
Computer Simulation
20%
Material Science
Fatigue Crack Growth
100%
Crack Tip
20%
Crack Closure
20%
Fatigue Damage
20%
Contact Condition
20%