Missing in action? France and the politicization of trade and investment agreements

Sophie Meunier, Christilla Roederer-Rynning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) between the European Union (EU) and the United States (US) and for the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between the EU and Canada have provoked massive mobilization throughout Europe, both on the streets and online. Yet France, long at the epicenter of anti-globalization and anti-Americanism, has played a surprisingly modest role in the mobilization campaign against these agreements. This article asks why France did not contribute to anti-TTIP mobilization and, more broadly, how patterns of French mobilization over trade have changed over the past two decades. Using comparative-historical analysis, we explore to what extent this puzzling French reaction can be traced to changing attitudes towards the US, agenda-shaping by the French government, and transformations in the venues and techniques of social mobilization. We thus contribute to the growing literature on the politicization of trade agreements and offer insights into the links between domestic and international politics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)312-324
Number of pages13
JournalPolitics and Governance
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Keywords

  • Common Commercial Policy
  • Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement
  • European Union
  • France
  • Investment
  • Multilateral investment agreement
  • Politicization
  • Trade
  • Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Missing in action? France and the politicization of trade and investment agreements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this