Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Princeton University Home
Help & FAQ
Home
Profiles
Research units
Facilities
Projects
Research output
Press/Media
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Ministerial responsiveness in westminster systems: Institutional choices and house of commons debate, 1832-1915
Andrew C. Eggers
,
Arthur Spirling
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
38
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ministerial responsiveness in westminster systems: Institutional choices and house of commons debate, 1832-1915'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
House of Commons
100%
Institutional Choice
100%
Westminster System
100%
Members of Parliament
66%
Agenda-setting Power
66%
Historical Development
33%
Novel Measure
33%
Procedural Powers
33%
Ministers
33%
Public Agenda
33%
Parliamentary Speeches
33%
Railway Timetable
33%
Arts and Humanities
Responsiveness
100%
House of commons
100%
Westminster
100%
Arrangement
33%
Historical Development
33%
scrutiny
33%
Parliamentary
33%
Procedural
33%
Agenda setting
33%
Social Sciences
Historical Development
100%
Railway
100%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
New Institutional Economics
100%