Military Attitudes on the Chemical Weapons Taboo: Evidence from the Pacific Theater

Christopher W. Blair, Michael C. Horowitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Little is known about military attitudes toward weapons taboos or the durability of nonuse norms in wartime. Chemical weapons are a key case given public revulsion and clear international prohibitions. We explore soldiers’ attitudes in a salient setting: the Pacific theater of World War II. We draw on a declassified survey covering a representative sample of enlisted US soldiers in Hawaii in 1944. This unique context, during a total war against an adversary that had employed chemical weapons, represents a hard test for the chemical weapons taboo. Up to 91% of soldiers supported using chemical weapons against Japan, including 24% who favored initiation and 67% who favored retaliatory use. To understand the influence of military instruction, we exploit a novel regimen still used in basic training, which saw some troops exposed to lachrymatory gas. We find exposure to chemical weapons in training reduced support for use. Visceral experiences can mobilize support for weapons taboos in otherwise permissive environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1075-1082
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume86
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2024

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Keywords

  • chemical weapons
  • elite survey
  • norms
  • public opinion
  • taboos

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Military Attitudes on the Chemical Weapons Taboo: Evidence from the Pacific Theater'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this