Abstract
This article begins by briefly reconstructing the intellectual history of militant democracy, starting with Loewenstein's work and moving on to the ways in which the doctrine of militant democracy was developed in postwar West German constitutional law in particular. It next compares varieties of militant democracy, mostly, but not only in different post-authoritarian countries, before touching on the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, which has developed its own perspective on militant democracy. It then returns to the normative core questions surrounding militant democracy and asks whether one might conclude that some strategies for defending democracy are clearly superior to others - and what their implications are for constitutional law.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780191751967 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780199578610 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 21 2012 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Social Sciences
Keywords
- European Court of Human Rights
- Loewenstein
- Militant democracy
- West German constitutional law