Meritocratic representation

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

10 Scopus citations


No individual or body can count as the representative of another unless selected or authorized to act in that role. The representative speaks and acts in the name of another individual or group, and this, unlike speaking or acting on another's behalf – say, speaking or acting as a self-appointed advocate – requires authorization in the role. This authorization raises two questions. First, is it legitimate? Is the representative selected by a suitable agent or agency and under suitable rules? Second, is it motivated? Is the selection made on the grounds that the candidate is distinctively eligible or qualified for a representative role? Under electoral arrangements, authorization comes via the selection of the representative, directly or indirectly, on the basis of a popular vote. And it is the disposition to be responsive to the attitudes of electors, which that very mode of selection is designed to encourage, that qualifies the candidate to serve in a representative role. The candidate or deputy may be responsive at only a general level to the attitudes of electors – say, to their values or interests – or responsive to detailed wishes and instructions; in the first case, such a deputy will count as a trustee, in the second as a delegate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe East Asian Challenge for Democracy
Subtitle of host publicationPolitical Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective
PublisherCambridge University Press
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9781139814850
ISBN (Print)9781107038394
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Social Sciences


Dive into the research topics of 'Meritocratic representation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this