TY - JOUR
T1 - Membrane configuration influences microbial capacitive desalination performance
AU - Ma, Dandan
AU - Forrestal, Casey
AU - Ji, Min
AU - Li, Ruying
AU - Ma, Hongting
AU - Ren, Zhiyong Jason
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - A microbial capacitive desalination cell (MCDC) is a new bioelectrochemical reactor for energy-positive wastewater treatment and desalination. So far, MCDCs have only used two cation exchange membranes (CEMs) to separate three chambers (CC-MCDC), and in this study we investigated how and why different membrane setups can impact system performance. Three types of MCDCs were developed by using different combinations of CEMs and anion exchange membranes (AEMs). In addition to the CC-MCDC, a CA-MCDC used a CEM to separate the anode chamber from the middle chamber and an AEM to divide the middle and cathode chambers, and an AA-MCDC used two AEMs to separate the three chambers. Results showed that the membrane effects are significant due to the different ion transfer mechanisms. The CA-MCDC shows higher performance by removing salts from all three chambers, with anode, middle, and cathode chamber desalination efficiencies of 14.5%, 44.4%, and 5.3%, respectively. The performance of the reactors decreased by 7-12% after a 5-month operation, and the AA-MCDC showed the lowest membrane scaling potential during the long-term operation.
AB - A microbial capacitive desalination cell (MCDC) is a new bioelectrochemical reactor for energy-positive wastewater treatment and desalination. So far, MCDCs have only used two cation exchange membranes (CEMs) to separate three chambers (CC-MCDC), and in this study we investigated how and why different membrane setups can impact system performance. Three types of MCDCs were developed by using different combinations of CEMs and anion exchange membranes (AEMs). In addition to the CC-MCDC, a CA-MCDC used a CEM to separate the anode chamber from the middle chamber and an AEM to divide the middle and cathode chambers, and an AA-MCDC used two AEMs to separate the three chambers. Results showed that the membrane effects are significant due to the different ion transfer mechanisms. The CA-MCDC shows higher performance by removing salts from all three chambers, with anode, middle, and cathode chamber desalination efficiencies of 14.5%, 44.4%, and 5.3%, respectively. The performance of the reactors decreased by 7-12% after a 5-month operation, and the AA-MCDC showed the lowest membrane scaling potential during the long-term operation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984920642&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984920642&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1039/c5ew00003c
DO - 10.1039/c5ew00003c
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84984920642
SN - 2053-1400
VL - 1
SP - 348
EP - 354
JO - Environmental Science: Water Research and Technology
JF - Environmental Science: Water Research and Technology
IS - 3
ER -