Mechanisms underlying dependencies of performance on stimulus history in a two-alternative forced-choice task

Raymond Y. Cho, Leigh E. Nystrom, Eric T. Brown, Andrew D. Jones, Todd S. Braver, Philip J. Holmes, Jonathan D. Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

67 Scopus citations

Abstract

In choice reaction time tasks, response times and error rates demonstrate differential dependencies on the identities of up to four stimuli preceding the current one. Although the general profile of reaction times and error rates, when plotted against the stimulus histories, may seem idiosyncratic, we show that it can result from simple underlying mechanisms that take account of the occurrence of stimulus repetitions and alternations. Employing a simple connectionist model of a two-alternative forced-choice task, we explored various combinations of repetition and alternation detection schemes in an attempt to account for empirical results from the literature and from our own studies. We found that certain combinations of the repetition and the alternation schemes provided good fits to the data, suggesting that simple mechanisms may serve to explain the complicated but highly reproducible higher order dependencies of task performance on stimulus history.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-299
Number of pages17
JournalCognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience
Volume2
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2002

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Mechanisms underlying dependencies of performance on stimulus history in a two-alternative forced-choice task'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this