Abstract
Economists have often treated the objective of health services as being the maximization of the QALYs gained, irrespective of how the gains are distributed. In a cross section of Australians such a policy of distributive neutrality received: (a) very little support when health benefits to young people compete with health benefits to the elderly; (b) only moderate support when those who can become a little better compete with those who can become much better; (c) only moderate support when smokers compete with non smokers; (d) some support when young children compete with newborns; and (e) wide spread support when parents of dependent children compete with people without children. Overall, the views of the study population were strongly egalitarian. A policy of health benefit maximization received very limited support when the consequence is a loss of equity and access to services for the elderly and for people with a limited potential for improving their health.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1429-1437 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Social Science and Medicine |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 1995 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Health(social science)
- History and Philosophy of Science
Keywords
- QALY
- egalitarian
- equity
- health economics
- priority
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Maximizing health benefits vs egalitarianism: An Australian survey of health issues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver