Abstract
Economists have often treated the objective of health services as being the maximization of the QALYs gained, irrespective of how the gains are distributed. In a cross section of Australians such a policy of distributive neutrality received: (a) very little support when health benefits to young people compete with health benefits to the elderly; (b) only moderate support when those who can become a little better compete with those who can become much better; (c) only moderate support when smokers compete with non smokers; (d) some support when young children compete with newborns; and (e) wide spread support when parents of dependent children compete with people without children. Overall, the views of the study population were strongly egalitarian. A policy of health benefit maximization received very limited support when the consequence is a loss of equity and access to services for the elderly and for people with a limited potential for improving their health.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1429-1437 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Social Science and Medicine |
Volume | 41 |
Issue number | 10 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 1995 |
Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Health(social science)
- History and Philosophy of Science
Keywords
- QALY
- egalitarian
- equity
- health economics
- priority