Marriage selection and mortality patterns: Inferences and fallacies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

219 Scopus citations

Abstract

Researchers have long wondered whether marital-status differences in mortality arise largely from selection mechanisms or from causal processes typically known as marriage protection. Unfortunately, many investigators have relied on aggregate patterns of mortality differentials-such as age schedules of excess mortality in the single population or the relationship between the level of excess mortality and the relative size of the single population-to make inferences about the relative importance of selection and causal processes. In this paper, a simple mathematical simulation model is used to demonstrate that many inferences derived from observed patterns are simply not justified. This finding highlights the importance of prospective data for assessing the relative importance of selection and causal factors in accounting for the excess mortality of the unmarried.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-208
Number of pages20
JournalDemography
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1993

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Demography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Marriage selection and mortality patterns: Inferences and fallacies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this