Maladaptive but malleable: Gender-science stereotypes emerge early but are modifiable by language

Michelle M. Wang, Amanda Cardarelli, Jonah Brenner, Sarah Jane Leslie, Marjorie Rhodes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Gender-science stereotypes emerge early in childhood, but little is known about the developmental processes by which they arise. The present study tested the hypothesis that language implying scientists are a special and distinct kind of person contributes to the development of gender-science stereotypes, even when it does not communicate stereotypic content. One cross-sectional and two longitudinal studies with racially and geographically diverse children (primarily from the United States; ages 4–5; N = 872, tested 2020–2022) revealed that gender stereotypes about science versus art (a) emerge before elementary school, (b) arise from commonplace identity-emphasizing language, especially among girls, and (c) can be durably disrupted by subtle changes to language. This study identifies a promising way to counteract stereotypes at their roots.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalChild development
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Maladaptive but malleable: Gender-science stereotypes emerge early but are modifiable by language'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this