Lessons learned from IPCC AR4: Scientific developments needed to understand, predict, and respond to climate change

Sarah J. Doherty, Stephan Bojinski, Ann Henderson-Sellers, Kevin Noone, David Goodrich, Nathaniel L. Bindoff, John A. Church, Kathy A. Hibbard, Thomas R. Karl, Lucka Kajfez-Bogataj, Amanda H. Lynch, David E. Parker, Colin L. Prentice, Venkatachalam Ramaswamy, Roger W. Saunders, Mark Stafford Smith, Konrad Steffen, Thomas F. Stocker, Peter W. Thorne, Kevin E. TrenberthMichel M. Verstraete, Francis W. Zwiers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Crimate Change (IPCC) concluded that global warming is "unequivocal" and that most of the observed increase since the mid-iwentieth century is very likely due to the increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations, with discernible human influences on ocean warming, continental-average temperatures, temperature extremes, wind patterns, and other physical and biological indicators, impacting both socioeconomic and ecological systems. It is now clear that we are committed to some level of global dlimate change, and it is imperative that this be considered when planning future climate research and observational strategies. The Global Climate Observing System program (GCOS), the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP), and the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) therefore initiated a process to summarize the lessons learned through AR4 Worldng Groups I and II and to identify a set of high-priority modeling and observational needs. Two classes of recommendations emerged. First is the need to improve climate models, observational and climate monitoring systems, and our understanding of key processes. Second, the framework for climate research and observations must be extended guide adaptation and mitigation efforts. Research and observational strategies specifically. to predict and understand impacts, adaptive capacity, and societal and ecosystem vulnerabilities will serve both purposes and are the subject of the specific recommendations made in this paper.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)497-513
Number of pages17
JournalBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Volume90
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Atmospheric Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lessons learned from IPCC AR4: Scientific developments needed to understand, predict, and respond to climate change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this