TY - GEN
T1 - Learning to select computations
AU - Callaway, Frederick
AU - Gul, Sayan
AU - Krueger, Paul
AU - Griffiths, Thomas L.
AU - Lieder, Falk
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 34th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 2018. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - The efficient use of limited computational resources is an essential ingredient of intelligence. Selecting computations optimally according to rational metareasoning would achieve this, but this is computationally intractable. Inspired by psychology and neuroscience, we propose the first concrete and domain-general learning algorithm for approximating the optimal selection of computations: Bayesian metalevel policy search (BMPS). We derive this general, sample-efficient search algorithm for a computation-selecting metalevel policy based on the insight that the value of information lies between the myopic value of information and the value of perfect information. We evaluate BMPS on three increasingly difficult metareasoning problems: when to terminate computation, how to allocate computation between competing options, and planning. Across all three domains, BMPS achieved near-optimal performance and compared favorably to previously proposed metar-easoning heuristics. Finally, we demonstrate the practical utility of BMPS in an emergency management scenario, even accounting for the overhead of metareasoning.
AB - The efficient use of limited computational resources is an essential ingredient of intelligence. Selecting computations optimally according to rational metareasoning would achieve this, but this is computationally intractable. Inspired by psychology and neuroscience, we propose the first concrete and domain-general learning algorithm for approximating the optimal selection of computations: Bayesian metalevel policy search (BMPS). We derive this general, sample-efficient search algorithm for a computation-selecting metalevel policy based on the insight that the value of information lies between the myopic value of information and the value of perfect information. We evaluate BMPS on three increasingly difficult metareasoning problems: when to terminate computation, how to allocate computation between competing options, and planning. Across all three domains, BMPS achieved near-optimal performance and compared favorably to previously proposed metar-easoning heuristics. Finally, we demonstrate the practical utility of BMPS in an emergency management scenario, even accounting for the overhead of metareasoning.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059393836&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059393836&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85059393836
T3 - 34th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 2018, UAI 2018
SP - 776
EP - 785
BT - 34th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 2018, UAI 2018
A2 - Silva, Ricardo
A2 - Globerson, Amir
A2 - Globerson, Amir
PB - Association For Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (AUAI)
T2 - 34th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 2018, UAI 2018
Y2 - 6 August 2018 through 10 August 2018
ER -