TY - JOUR
T1 - Laminar differences in gamma and alpha coherence in the ventral stream
AU - Buffalo, Elizabeth A.
AU - Fries, Pascal
AU - Landman, Rogier
AU - Buschman, Timothy J.
AU - Desimone, Robert
PY - 2011/7/5
Y1 - 2011/7/5
N2 - Attention to a stimulus enhances both neuronal responses and gamma frequency synchrony in visual area V4, both ofwhich should increase the impact of attended information on downstream neurons. To determine whether gamma synchrony is common throughout the ventral stream, we recorded from neurons in the superficial and deep layers of V1, V2, and V4 in two rhesusmonkeys.We found an unexpected striking difference in gamma synchrony in the superficial vs. deep layers. In all three areas, spike-field coherence in the gamma (40-60 Hz) frequency range was largely confined to the superficial layers,whereas the deep layers showedmaximal coherence at low frequencies (6-16 Hz), which included the alpha range. In the superficial layers of V2 and V4, gamma synchrony was enhanced by attention, whereas in the deep layers, alpha synchrony was reduced by attention. Unlike these major differences in synchrony, attentional effects on firing rates and noise correlation did not differ substantially between the superficial and deep layers. The results suggest that synchrony plays very different roles in feedback and feedforward projections.
AB - Attention to a stimulus enhances both neuronal responses and gamma frequency synchrony in visual area V4, both ofwhich should increase the impact of attended information on downstream neurons. To determine whether gamma synchrony is common throughout the ventral stream, we recorded from neurons in the superficial and deep layers of V1, V2, and V4 in two rhesusmonkeys.We found an unexpected striking difference in gamma synchrony in the superficial vs. deep layers. In all three areas, spike-field coherence in the gamma (40-60 Hz) frequency range was largely confined to the superficial layers,whereas the deep layers showedmaximal coherence at low frequencies (6-16 Hz), which included the alpha range. In the superficial layers of V2 and V4, gamma synchrony was enhanced by attention, whereas in the deep layers, alpha synchrony was reduced by attention. Unlike these major differences in synchrony, attentional effects on firing rates and noise correlation did not differ substantially between the superficial and deep layers. The results suggest that synchrony plays very different roles in feedback and feedforward projections.
KW - Electrophysiology
KW - Macaque
KW - Oscillation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960586901&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960586901&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1011284108
DO - 10.1073/pnas.1011284108
M3 - Article
C2 - 21690410
AN - SCOPUS:79960586901
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 108
SP - 11262
EP - 11267
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 27
ER -