L'éducation civique libérale et le fondamentalisme religieux: L'affaire Dieu contre John Rawls

Translated title of the contribution: Liberal civic education and religious fundamentalism: The case of God v. John Rawls?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

With the rise of feminist and cultural protests, political liberalism has been criticized for promoting a version of public neutrality that does not take diversity seriously and marginalizes sexual, religious and cultural minorities. Thus, the "politics of difference" has been seen as a legitimate democratic alternative to a kind of liberalism hostile to diversity. Stephen Macedo aims to show that political liberalism respects a broad range of conceptions of the good and of ways of life, but cannot accommodate minorities who reject pluralism itself in order to maintain their group identity and whose claims and practises impede civic education and undermine toleration.

Translated title of the contributionLiberal civic education and religious fundamentalism: The case of God v. John Rawls?
Original languageFrench
Pages (from-to)149-188
Number of pages40
JournalRaisons Politiques
Volume47
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Liberal civic education and religious fundamentalism: The case of God v. John Rawls?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this