TY - JOUR
T1 - Ketamine and Imipramine Reverse Transcriptional Signatures of Susceptibility and Induce Resilience-Specific Gene Expression Profiles
AU - Bagot, Rosemary C.
AU - Cates, Hannah M.
AU - Purushothaman, Immanuel
AU - Vialou, Vincent
AU - Heller, Elizabeth A.
AU - Yieh, Lynn
AU - LaBonté, Benoit
AU - Peña, Catherine J.
AU - Shen, Li
AU - Wittenberg, Gayle M.
AU - Nestler, Eric J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Society of Biological Psychiatry
PY - 2017/2/15
Y1 - 2017/2/15
N2 - Background Examining transcriptional regulation by antidepressants in key neural circuits implicated in depression and understanding the relation to transcriptional mechanisms of susceptibility and natural resilience may help in the search for new therapeutic agents. Given the heterogeneity of treatment response in human populations, examining both treatment response and nonresponse is critical. Methods We compared the effects of a conventional monoamine-based tricyclic antidepressant, imipramine, and a rapidly acting, non–monoamine-based antidepressant, ketamine, in mice subjected to chronic social defeat stress, a validated depression model, and used RNA sequencing to analyze transcriptional profiles associated with susceptibility, resilience, and antidepressant response and nonresponse in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), nucleus accumbens, hippocampus, and amygdala. Results We identified similar numbers of responders and nonresponders after ketamine or imipramine treatment. Ketamine induced more expression changes in the hippocampus; imipramine induced more expression changes in the nucleus accumbens and amygdala. Transcriptional profiles in treatment responders were most similar in the PFC. Nonresponse reflected both the lack of response-associated gene expression changes and unique gene regulation. In responders, both drugs reversed susceptibility-associated transcriptional changes and induced resilience-associated transcription in the PFC. Conclusions We generated a uniquely large resource of gene expression data in four interconnected limbic brain regions implicated in depression and its treatment with imipramine or ketamine. Our analyses highlight the PFC as a key site of common transcriptional regulation by antidepressant drugs and in both reversing susceptibility– and inducing resilience–associated molecular adaptations. In addition, we found region-specific effects of each drug, suggesting both common and unique effects of imipramine versus ketamine.
AB - Background Examining transcriptional regulation by antidepressants in key neural circuits implicated in depression and understanding the relation to transcriptional mechanisms of susceptibility and natural resilience may help in the search for new therapeutic agents. Given the heterogeneity of treatment response in human populations, examining both treatment response and nonresponse is critical. Methods We compared the effects of a conventional monoamine-based tricyclic antidepressant, imipramine, and a rapidly acting, non–monoamine-based antidepressant, ketamine, in mice subjected to chronic social defeat stress, a validated depression model, and used RNA sequencing to analyze transcriptional profiles associated with susceptibility, resilience, and antidepressant response and nonresponse in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), nucleus accumbens, hippocampus, and amygdala. Results We identified similar numbers of responders and nonresponders after ketamine or imipramine treatment. Ketamine induced more expression changes in the hippocampus; imipramine induced more expression changes in the nucleus accumbens and amygdala. Transcriptional profiles in treatment responders were most similar in the PFC. Nonresponse reflected both the lack of response-associated gene expression changes and unique gene regulation. In responders, both drugs reversed susceptibility-associated transcriptional changes and induced resilience-associated transcription in the PFC. Conclusions We generated a uniquely large resource of gene expression data in four interconnected limbic brain regions implicated in depression and its treatment with imipramine or ketamine. Our analyses highlight the PFC as a key site of common transcriptional regulation by antidepressant drugs and in both reversing susceptibility– and inducing resilience–associated molecular adaptations. In addition, we found region-specific effects of each drug, suggesting both common and unique effects of imipramine versus ketamine.
KW - Depression
KW - Imipramine
KW - Ketamine
KW - RNA-seq
KW - Resilience
KW - Susceptibility
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84993964958&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84993964958&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.06.012
DO - 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.06.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 27569543
AN - SCOPUS:84993964958
SN - 0006-3223
VL - 81
SP - 285
EP - 295
JO - Biological Psychiatry
JF - Biological Psychiatry
IS - 4
ER -