Abstract
In the first part of the paper I reconstruct Kant's proof of the existence of a 'most real being' while also highlighting the theory of modality that motivates Kant's departure from Leibniz's version of the proof. I go on to argue that it is precisely this departure that makes the being that falls out of the pre-critical proof look more like Spinoza's extended natura naturans than an independent, personal creator-God. In the critical period, Kant seems to think that transcendental idealism allows him to avoid this conclusion, but in the last section of the paper I argue that there is still one important version of the Spinozistic threat that remains.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 635-675 |
| Number of pages | 41 |
| Journal | Mind |
| Volume | 121 |
| Issue number | 483 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Kant, real possibility, and the threat of Spinoza'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver