Just Words: Intentions, Tolerance and Lexical Selection*

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

We all make mistakes in pronunciation and spelling, but a common view is that there are limits beyond which a mistaken pronunciation or spelling becomes too dramatic to be recognized as of a particular word at all. These considerations have bolstered a family of accounts that invoke speaker intentions and standards for tolerance as determinants of which word, if any, an utterance tokens. I argue this is a mistake. Neither intentions nor standards of tolerance are necessary or sufficient (individually or jointly) for determining which word an utterance tokens. Instead, drawing in part on empirical research on word production, I offer an alternative account, Originalism-plus-Transfer (OPT), according to which word tokening depends entirely on lexical selection during word production, and on how the selected lexical item is situated within the network of causal/historical connections leading back to its neologizing. Once the elements of my account are in place, as a bonus, we will have resources for a promising answer to the question of word individuation as well.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-17
Number of pages15
JournalPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research
Volume105
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Just Words: Intentions, Tolerance and Lexical Selection*'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this