Just and unjust proliferation*

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Political theorists had vigorous debates about nuclear weapons in the 1980s but have been largely silent about them recently. This article seeks to reopen those discussions. It evaluates the main justifications for nuclear proliferation since 1945: arguments from consistency, nationalism, democratic legitimacy, self-defense, peaceful effects, and supreme emergency. Most of these arguments are badly flawed, as are the arguments for retaining the nuclear arsenals of many of the established nuclear powers. Instead, this article proposes a first cut at a stringent standard for judging the acquisition of strategic nuclear weapons, drawing on jus ad bellum and jus in bello principles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)349-383
Number of pages35
Issue number3
StatePublished - Apr 1 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy


Dive into the research topics of 'Just and unjust proliferation*'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this