IWSHM 2017: Quantifying the benefit of structural health monitoring: what if the manager is not the owner?

Denise Bolognani, Andrea Verzobio, Daniel Tonelli, Carlo Cappello, Branko Glisic, Daniele Zonta, John Quigley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations


Only very recently our community has acknowledged that the benefit of structural health monitoring can be properly quantified using the concept of value of information (VoI). The VoI is the difference between the utilities of operating the structure with and without the monitoring system. Typically, it is assumed that there is one decision-maker for all decisions, that is, deciding on both the investment on the monitoring system and the operation of the structure. The aim of this work is to formalize a rational method for quantifying the value of information when two different actors are involved in the decision chain: the manager, who makes decisions regarding the structure, based on monitoring data; and the owner, who chooses whether to install the monitoring system or not, before having access to these data. The two decision-makers, even if both rational and exposed to the same background information, may still act differently because of their different appetites for risk. To illustrate how this framework works, we evaluate a hypothetical VoI for the Streicker Bridge, a pedestrian bridge in Princeton University campus equipped with a fiber optic sensing system, assuming that two fictional characters, Malcolm and Ophelia, are involved: Malcolm is the manager who decides whether to keep the bridge open or close it following to an incident; Ophelia is the owner who decides whether to invest on a monitoring system to help Malcolm making the right decision. We demonstrate that when manager and owner are two different individuals, the benefit of monitoring could be greater or smaller than when all the decisions are made by the same individual. Under appropriate conditions, the monitoring VoI could even be negative, meaning that the owner is willing to pay to prevent the manager to use the monitoring system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1393-1409
Number of pages17
JournalStructural Health Monitoring
Issue number6
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Biophysics


  • Bayesian inference
  • Value of information
  • bridge management
  • decision-making
  • expected utility theory
  • fiber optic sensors


Dive into the research topics of 'IWSHM 2017: Quantifying the benefit of structural health monitoring: what if the manager is not the owner?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this