Is vacuum decay significant in ekpyrotic and cyclic models?

Paul J. Steinhardt

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.101302

Is vacuum decay significant in ekpyrotic and cyclic models?

Paul J. Steinhardt

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

It has recently been argued that bubble nucleation in ekpyrotic and cyclic cosmological scenarios can lead to unacceptable inhomogeneities unless certain constraints are satisfied. In this paper we show that this is not the case. We find that bubble nucleation is completely negligible in realistic models.

Original language	English (US)
Journal	Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology
Volume	66
Issue number	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.66.101302
State	Published - Nov 25 2002

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)

Access to Document

10.1103/PhysRevD.66.101302

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is vacuum decay significant in ekpyrotic and cyclic models?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Steinhardt, P. J. (2002). Is vacuum decay significant in ekpyrotic and cyclic models? Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, 66(10). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.66.101302

@article{e122783bac8040e79efcb4f29e54f715,

title = "Is vacuum decay significant in ekpyrotic and cyclic models?",

abstract = "It has recently been argued that bubble nucleation in ekpyrotic and cyclic cosmological scenarios can lead to unacceptable inhomogeneities unless certain constraints are satisfied. In this paper we show that this is not the case. We find that bubble nucleation is completely negligible in realistic models.",

author = "Steinhardt, {Paul J.}",

year = "2002",

month = nov,

day = "25",

doi = "10.1103/PhysRevD.66.101302",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "66",

journal = "Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology",