Introduction cross-examination?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


From Galileo to the Bhopal tort litigation, Scopes to OncoMouse®, Lysenko to the lie detector, the agonistic and alethic forum of the courtroom has offered unique opportunities to witness science and scientists being made and unmade. Evolving legal systems have consistently been forced to draw on (or defensibly away from) scientific knowledge, scientific methods, and scientific experts in the pursuit of truth and justice. At the same time, courts-in many ways the original site for the production of social facts-have to a significant extent shaped both the theories and the practices of knowledge production central to the emergence of modern science. This Focus section draws together a set of scholars at work on these borrowings and aims to stimulate more research, in an important and fast-expanding area of scholarship.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)310-314
Number of pages5
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2007

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • History and Philosophy of Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Introduction cross-examination?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this