Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Internal pair conversion in heavy nuclei

  • I. Ahmad
  • , S. M. Austin
  • , B. B. Back
  • , R. R. Betts
  • , F. P. Calaprice
  • , K. C. Chan
  • , A. A. Chishti
  • , C. Conner
  • , R. W. Dunford
  • , J. D. Fox
  • , S. J. Freedman
  • , M. Freer
  • , J. S. Greenberg
  • , S. B. Gazes
  • , A. L. Hallin
  • , T. Happ
  • , D. Henderson
  • , N. I. Kaloskamis
  • , E. Kashy
  • , W. Kutschera
  • J. Last, C. J. Lister, M. Liu, M. R. Maier, D. J. Mercer, D. Mikolas, P. A.A. Perera, M. D. Rhein, D. E. Roa, J. P. Schiffer, T. A. Trainor, P. Wilt, J. S. Winfield, M. Wolanski, F. L.H. Wolfs, A. H. Wuosmaa, G. Xu, A. Young, J. E. Yurkon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Positrons and electrons from the internal pair conversion (IPC) decay of states populated in near-barrier collisions of very heavy ions have been studied using the APEX spectrometer. Using inelastic [Formula Presented] scattering at 5.90 MeV/nucleon, the gamma and IPC branches of the well-known [Formula Presented] decay of the first [Formula Presented] state were kinematically reconstructed and the IPC-to-gamma branching ratio was determined to be [Formula Presented]. We have also performed experiments with actinide beams or targets; [Formula Presented], [Formula Presented], [Formula Presented], and [Formula Presented], which resulted in the observation of new gamma-ray transitions from high-lying states in [Formula Presented] and [Formula Presented]. None of these were populated with sufficient strength such that IPC could produce statistically significantly peaks in positron-electron sum energy spectra.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)R2755-R2759
JournalPhysical Review C - Nuclear Physics
Volume55
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Internal pair conversion in heavy nuclei'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this