Abstract
The present work examined the relationship between people's own interpretations of why they avoid intergroup contact and their interpretations of why out-groups avoid intergroup contact. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrate that Whites and Blacks would like to have more contact with the out-group but believe the out-group does not want to have contact with them. Studies 3-5 show that Whites and Blacks make divergent explanations about their own and their potential out-group partner's failure to initiate contact. Specifically, individuals explained their own inaction in terms of their fear of being rejected because of their race but attributed the out-group members' inaction to their lack of interest. Study 6 examined the behavioral consequences of this self-other bias. Finally, Study 7 applied theoretical work on the extended contact hypothesis to explore a means to reduce this self-other bias. The implications of these studies for improving intergroup interactions are discussed.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 91-107 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of personality and social psychology |
| Volume | 88 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2005 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Intergroup contact and pluralistic ignorance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver