Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Interference-Limited Absorption in Dense Molecular Nanolayers Near Reflecting Surfaces

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We investigate linear resonant absorption by a dense ensemble of molecules confined to a sub-wavelength layer in two geometries: (i) a free-standing film in a homogeneous space and (ii) the same film placed at a controlled distance from a reflecting surface. In both cases, increasing the effective light-matter coupling (via molecular density/oscillator strength) produces a nonmonotonic response: absorption rises to an optimum and then decreases as the film becomes increasingly radiatively bright and reflective. Finite-difference time-domain simulations and analytical transfer-matrix calculations agree quantitatively and yield compact ridge conditions for the optimum. We interpret the trends using a scattering/port picture: the isolated film is a symmetric two-port system (reflection and transmission), which bounds single-sided resonant absorption to ≤50% in the ultrathin limit (reflecting transition saturation), whereas adding a mirror suppresses transmission and converts the structure into an effectively one-port absorber. In the mirror-backed geometry, interference can cancel reflection, and unity absorption is obtained at critical coupling, when radiative leakage is balanced by intrinsic molecular loss. These results clarify fundamental limits and design rules for collective absorption in dense molecular layers near dielectric or metallic boundaries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4793-4803
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Physical Chemistry Letters
Volume17
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 23 2026

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Materials Science
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interference-Limited Absorption in Dense Molecular Nanolayers Near Reflecting Surfaces'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this