Interactive information complexity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

The primary goal of this paper is to define and study the interactive information complexity of functions. Let f(x, y) be a function, and suppose Alice is given x and Bob is given y. Informally, the interactive information complexity IC(f) of f is the least amount of information Alice and Bob need to reveal to each other to compute f. Previously, information complexity has been defined with respect to a prior distribution on the input pairs (x, y). Our first goal is to give a definition that is independent of the prior distribution. We show that several possible definitions are essentially equivalent. We establish some basic properties of the interactive information complexity IC(f). In particular, we show that IC(f) is equal to the amortized (randomized) communication complexity of f. We also show a direct sum theorem for IC(f) and give the first general connection between information complexity and (nonamortized) communication complexity. This connection implies that a nontrivial exchange of information is required when solving problems that have nontrivial communication complexity. We explore the information complexity of two specific problems: Equality and Disjointness. We show that only a constant amount of information needs to be exchanged when solving equality with no errors, while solving disjointness with a constant error probability requires the parties to reveal a linear amount of information to each other.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1698-1739
Number of pages42
JournalSIAM Journal on Computing
Volume44
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Computer Science
  • General Mathematics

Keywords

  • Communication complexity
  • Information complexity
  • Information theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interactive information complexity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this