TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science
AU - Hofman, Jake M.
AU - Watts, Duncan J.
AU - Athey, Susan
AU - Garip, Filiz
AU - Griffiths, Thomas L.
AU - Kleinberg, Jon
AU - Margetts, Helen
AU - Mullainathan, Sendhil
AU - Salganik, Matthew J.
AU - Vazire, Simine
AU - Vespignani, Alessandro
AU - Yarkoni, Tal
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2021/7/8
Y1 - 2021/7/8
N2 - Computational social science is more than just large repositories of digital data and the computational methods needed to construct and analyse them. It also represents a convergence of different fields with different ways of thinking about and doing science. The goal of this Perspective is to provide some clarity around how these approaches differ from one another and to propose how they might be productively integrated. Towards this end we make two contributions. The first is a schema for thinking about research activities along two dimensions—the extent to which work is explanatory, focusing on identifying and estimating causal effects, and the degree of consideration given to testing predictions of outcomes—and how these two priorities can complement, rather than compete with, one another. Our second contribution is to advocate that computational social scientists devote more attention to combining prediction and explanation, which we call integrative modelling, and to outline some practical suggestions for realizing this goal.
AB - Computational social science is more than just large repositories of digital data and the computational methods needed to construct and analyse them. It also represents a convergence of different fields with different ways of thinking about and doing science. The goal of this Perspective is to provide some clarity around how these approaches differ from one another and to propose how they might be productively integrated. Towards this end we make two contributions. The first is a schema for thinking about research activities along two dimensions—the extent to which work is explanatory, focusing on identifying and estimating causal effects, and the degree of consideration given to testing predictions of outcomes—and how these two priorities can complement, rather than compete with, one another. Our second contribution is to advocate that computational social scientists devote more attention to combining prediction and explanation, which we call integrative modelling, and to outline some practical suggestions for realizing this goal.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109232002&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85109232002&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41586-021-03659-0
DO - 10.1038/s41586-021-03659-0
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34194044
AN - SCOPUS:85109232002
SN - 0028-0836
VL - 595
SP - 181
EP - 188
JO - Nature
JF - Nature
IS - 7866
ER -