TY - GEN
T1 - Integrated, geothermal-CO2 storage reservoirs
T2 - Geothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting 2012 - Geothermal: Reliable, Renewable, Global, GRC 2012
AU - Buscheck, Thomas A.
AU - Elliot, Thomas R.
AU - Celia, Michael Anthony
AU - Chen, Mingjie
AU - Hao, Yue
AU - Lu, Chuanhe
AU - Sun, Yunwei
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - We analyze an adaptable, multi-stage, energy-recovery approach to reduce carbon intensity through sustainable geothermal energy production and secure geologic CO2 storage (GCS) with low environmental risk in saline, sedimentary formations. We combine the benefits of the approach proposed by Buscheck (2010), which uses brine as the heat-transfer working fluid, with those of the approach first suggested by Brown (2000) and analyzed by Pruess (2006), using CO2 as the working fluid, and then extended to saline-formation GCS by Saar et al. (2010) and Randolph and Saar (2011a). We also use pressure management to reduce the risks of induced seismicity and CO2 and brine leakage (Buscheck et al., 2012a; Court et al., 2012, 2011a, 2011b). Our approach can involve up to three stages, with stage one of the three-stage version involving recirculation of formation brine as the working fluid. In this paper we analyze a two-stage version, with stage one involving production (and net removal) of formation brine for heat recovery and to provide pressure management/relief for CO2 injection. Net removal of produced brine is achieved by applying it to a beneficial consumptive use: feedstock for fresh water production through desalination, saline cooling water, or make-up water injected into a nearby reservoir operation, such as in Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS), where there can be a shortage of working fluid. For stage one, it is important to find feasible utilization/disposition options to reduce the volume of blowdown, which is the residual brine requiring injection into the geothermal-GCS reservoir (Buscheck et al. 2012a, 2012b). During stage two, which begins as CO2 reaches the producers; co-produced brine and CO 2 are the working fluids. We present reservoir analyses of two-stage, integrated geothermal-GCS, using a simple conceptual model of a homogeneous, permeable reservoir, bounded by relatively impermeable sealing units. We assess CO2 storage capacity and geothermal energy production as a function of well spacing between CO2 injectors and brine/CO2 producers for various well patterns.
AB - We analyze an adaptable, multi-stage, energy-recovery approach to reduce carbon intensity through sustainable geothermal energy production and secure geologic CO2 storage (GCS) with low environmental risk in saline, sedimentary formations. We combine the benefits of the approach proposed by Buscheck (2010), which uses brine as the heat-transfer working fluid, with those of the approach first suggested by Brown (2000) and analyzed by Pruess (2006), using CO2 as the working fluid, and then extended to saline-formation GCS by Saar et al. (2010) and Randolph and Saar (2011a). We also use pressure management to reduce the risks of induced seismicity and CO2 and brine leakage (Buscheck et al., 2012a; Court et al., 2012, 2011a, 2011b). Our approach can involve up to three stages, with stage one of the three-stage version involving recirculation of formation brine as the working fluid. In this paper we analyze a two-stage version, with stage one involving production (and net removal) of formation brine for heat recovery and to provide pressure management/relief for CO2 injection. Net removal of produced brine is achieved by applying it to a beneficial consumptive use: feedstock for fresh water production through desalination, saline cooling water, or make-up water injected into a nearby reservoir operation, such as in Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS), where there can be a shortage of working fluid. For stage one, it is important to find feasible utilization/disposition options to reduce the volume of blowdown, which is the residual brine requiring injection into the geothermal-GCS reservoir (Buscheck et al. 2012a, 2012b). During stage two, which begins as CO2 reaches the producers; co-produced brine and CO 2 are the working fluids. We present reservoir analyses of two-stage, integrated geothermal-GCS, using a simple conceptual model of a homogeneous, permeable reservoir, bounded by relatively impermeable sealing units. We assess CO2 storage capacity and geothermal energy production as a function of well spacing between CO2 injectors and brine/CO2 producers for various well patterns.
KW - Co-production
KW - Geologic CO storage
KW - Geothermal
KW - Heat extraction
KW - Reservoir simulation
KW - Sedimentary formation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876250080&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876250080&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84876250080
SN - 9781622764341
T3 - Transactions - Geothermal Resources Council
SP - 373
EP - 382
BT - Geothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting 2012, GRC 2012 - Geothermal
Y2 - 30 September 2012 through 3 October 2012
ER -