TY - BOOK
T1 - Information, Democracy, and Autocracy
T2 - Economic Transparency and Political (In)Stability
AU - Hollyer, James R.
AU - Rosendorff, B. Peter
AU - Vreeland, James Raymond
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© James R. Hollyer, B. Peter Rosendorff, and James Raymond Vreeland 2018.
PY - 2021/1/1
Y1 - 2021/1/1
N2 - Advocates for economic development often call for greater transparency. But what does transparency really mean? What are its consequences? This breakthrough book demonstrates how information impacts major political phenomena, including mass protest, the survival of dictatorships, democratic stability, as well as economic performance. The book introduces a new measure of a specific facet of transparency: the dissemination of economic data. Analysis shows that democracies make economic data more available than do similarly developed autocracies. Transparency attracts investment and makes democracies more resilient to breakdown. But transparency has a dubious consequence under autocracy: political instability. Mass unrest becomes more likely, and transparency can facilitate democratic transition, but most often a new despotic regime displaces the old. Autocratic leaders may also turn these threats to their advantage, using the risk of mass unrest that transparency portends to unify the ruling elite. Policymakers must recognize the trade-offs that transparency entails.
AB - Advocates for economic development often call for greater transparency. But what does transparency really mean? What are its consequences? This breakthrough book demonstrates how information impacts major political phenomena, including mass protest, the survival of dictatorships, democratic stability, as well as economic performance. The book introduces a new measure of a specific facet of transparency: the dissemination of economic data. Analysis shows that democracies make economic data more available than do similarly developed autocracies. Transparency attracts investment and makes democracies more resilient to breakdown. But transparency has a dubious consequence under autocracy: political instability. Mass unrest becomes more likely, and transparency can facilitate democratic transition, but most often a new despotic regime displaces the old. Autocratic leaders may also turn these threats to their advantage, using the risk of mass unrest that transparency portends to unify the ruling elite. Policymakers must recognize the trade-offs that transparency entails.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136704631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85136704631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/9781108355100
DO - 10.1017/9781108355100
M3 - Book
AN - SCOPUS:85136704631
SN - 9781108420723
BT - Information, Democracy, and Autocracy
PB - Cambridge University Press
ER -