Infant health production functions: What a difference the data make

Nancy E. Reichman, Hope Corman, Kelly Noonan, Dhaval Dave

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations


We examine the extent to which infant health production functions are sensitive to model specification and measurement error. We focus on the importance of typically unobserved but theoretically important variables (typically unobserved variables, TUVs), other non-standard covariates (NSCs), input reporting, and characterization of infant health. The TUVs represent wantedness, taste for risky behavior, and maternal health endowment. The NSCs include father characteristics. We estimate the effects of prenatal drug use, prenatal cigarette smoking, and first trimester prenatal care on birth weight, low birth weight, and a measure of abnormal infant health conditions. We compare estimates using self-reported inputs versus input measures that combine information from medical records and self-reports. We find that TUVs and NSCs are significantly associated with both inputs and outcomes, but that excluding them from infant health production functions does not appreciably affect the input estimates. However, using self-reported inputs leads to overestimated effects of inputs, particularly prenatal care, on outcomes, and using a direct measure of infant health does not always yield input estimates similar to those when using birth weight outcomes. The findings have implications for research, data collection, and public health policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)761-782
Number of pages22
JournalHealth Economics
Issue number7
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy


  • Infant health
  • Prenatal care
  • Prenatal illicit drug use
  • Prenatal smoking


Dive into the research topics of 'Infant health production functions: What a difference the data make'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this