TY - JOUR
T1 - Induced subgraphs of graphs with large chromatic number. V. Chandeliers and strings
AU - Chudnovsky, Maria
AU - Scott, Alex
AU - Seymour, Paul
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by NSF grants DMS-1265803 and DMS-1550991.Supported by ONR grant N00014-14-1-0084, NSF grants DMS-1265563 and DMS-1800053, and AFOSR grant A9550-19-1-0187.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - It is known that every graph of sufficiently large chromatic number and bounded clique number contains, as an induced subgraph, a subdivision of any fixed forest, and a subdivision of any fixed cycle. Equivalently, every forest is pervasive, and K3 is pervasive, in the class of all graphs, where we say a graph H is “pervasive” (in some class of graphs) if for all ℓ≥1, every graph in the class of bounded clique number and sufficiently large chromatic number has an induced subgraph that is a subdivision of H, in which every edge of H is replaced by a path of at least ℓ edges. Which other graphs are pervasive? It was proved by Chalopin, Esperet, Li and Ossona de Mendez that every such graph is a “forest of lanterns”: roughly, every block is a “lantern”, a graph obtained from a tree by adding one extra vertex, and there are rules about how the blocks fit together. It is not known whether every forest of lanterns is pervasive in the class of all graphs; but in another paper two of us prove that all “banana trees” are pervasive, that is, multigraphs obtained from a forest by adding parallel edges, thus generalizing the two results above. This paper contains the first half of the proof, which works for any forest of lanterns, not just for banana trees. Say a class of graphs is “ρ-controlled” if for every graph in the class, its chromatic number is at most some function (determined by the class) of the largest chromatic number of a ρ-ball in the graph. In this paper we prove that for every ρ≥2, and for every ρ-controlled class, every forest of lanterns is pervasive in this class. These results turn out particularly nicely when applied to string graphs. A “chandelier” is a special lantern, a graph obtained from a tree by adding a vertex adjacent to precisely the leaves of the tree. A “string graph” is the intersection graph of a set of curves in the plane. There are string graphs with clique number two and chromatic number arbitrarily large. We prove that the class of string graphs is 2-controlled, and consequently every forest of lanterns is pervasive in this class; but in fact something stronger is true, that every string graph of sufficiently large chromatic number and bounded clique number contains each fixed chandelier as an induced subgraph (not just as a subdivision); and the same for most forests of chandeliers (there is an extra condition on how the blocks are attached together).
AB - It is known that every graph of sufficiently large chromatic number and bounded clique number contains, as an induced subgraph, a subdivision of any fixed forest, and a subdivision of any fixed cycle. Equivalently, every forest is pervasive, and K3 is pervasive, in the class of all graphs, where we say a graph H is “pervasive” (in some class of graphs) if for all ℓ≥1, every graph in the class of bounded clique number and sufficiently large chromatic number has an induced subgraph that is a subdivision of H, in which every edge of H is replaced by a path of at least ℓ edges. Which other graphs are pervasive? It was proved by Chalopin, Esperet, Li and Ossona de Mendez that every such graph is a “forest of lanterns”: roughly, every block is a “lantern”, a graph obtained from a tree by adding one extra vertex, and there are rules about how the blocks fit together. It is not known whether every forest of lanterns is pervasive in the class of all graphs; but in another paper two of us prove that all “banana trees” are pervasive, that is, multigraphs obtained from a forest by adding parallel edges, thus generalizing the two results above. This paper contains the first half of the proof, which works for any forest of lanterns, not just for banana trees. Say a class of graphs is “ρ-controlled” if for every graph in the class, its chromatic number is at most some function (determined by the class) of the largest chromatic number of a ρ-ball in the graph. In this paper we prove that for every ρ≥2, and for every ρ-controlled class, every forest of lanterns is pervasive in this class. These results turn out particularly nicely when applied to string graphs. A “chandelier” is a special lantern, a graph obtained from a tree by adding a vertex adjacent to precisely the leaves of the tree. A “string graph” is the intersection graph of a set of curves in the plane. There are string graphs with clique number two and chromatic number arbitrarily large. We prove that the class of string graphs is 2-controlled, and consequently every forest of lanterns is pervasive in this class; but in fact something stronger is true, that every string graph of sufficiently large chromatic number and bounded clique number contains each fixed chandelier as an induced subgraph (not just as a subdivision); and the same for most forests of chandeliers (there is an extra condition on how the blocks are attached together).
KW - Colouring
KW - String graph
KW - χ-bounded
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107687789&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107687789&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jctb.2021.05.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jctb.2021.05.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85107687789
SN - 0095-8956
VL - 150
SP - 195
EP - 243
JO - Journal of Combinatorial Theory. Series B
JF - Journal of Combinatorial Theory. Series B
ER -