TY - JOUR
T1 - In War and Peace
T2 - Shifting Narratives of Violence in Kurdish Istanbul
AU - Günay, Onur
N1 - Funding Information:
The lives and experiences of the Kurdish migrant workers have been the inspiration behind this work. I cannot thank them enough for what they have taught me. I truly hope that my work has done some measure of justice to their own authorship of their lives. I am very grateful to João Biehl, Lisa Davis, Julia Elyachar, Carol Greenhouse, Didier Fassin, and Jean Comaroff for their attentive reading and insightful comments on multiple drafts of this essay. I benefited greatly from the comments and suggestions of the article's anonymous reviewers, and I am thankful to them and to Deborah Thomas for her incredible editorial guidance at every step. Early versions of this essay were presented at the Kurdish Studies Conference at Bilgi University (Istanbul) in 2015; the “Urban Violences and Instabilities” panel at the 2016 American Ethnological Society meetings; “Rackham Interdisciplinary Workshop Studies on Turkey” at University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; and the “Mellon Seminar on Migration and the Humanities” at Harvard University, Mahindra Humanities Center in 2017. I want to thank Meltem Ahıska, the editorial board of the Toplum ve Kuram, Deniz Duruiz, Haydar Darıcı, Özge Savaş, Pınar Üstel, Andrew Shryock, Fatma Müge Göçek, Adriana Petryna, Quincy Amoah, Thalia Gigerenzer, Heath Pearson, Sebastian Ramirez, Alex Balistreri, Zeynep Yaşar, Justin Perez, Laurence Ralph, Homi K. Bhabha, Steve Caton, Sumayya Kassamali, Kaya Williams, Cemal Kafadar, and Alişya Anlaş for their very helpful questions and comments. I would also like to express my gratitude to Şerif Derince and Ergin Öpengin for their help with the Kurdish abstract. Research and writing for this essay were supported by Princeton University Department of Anthropology, Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies, Princeton University Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, and Andrew W. Mellon Postdoctoral Fellowship at Harvard University Mahindra Humanities Center.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by the American Anthropological Association
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - In this article, I draw on two years of ethnographic research to explore the multiple and contradictory ways Kurdish working-class men in Istanbul imagine, narrate, and conceptualize violence. How Kurdish workers remember and publicly speak of violence, self-defense, and retribution has notably changed in the context of the resurgence of the war between the Turkish state and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK). I came to understand this storytelling of violence, omnipresent in all the social infrastructures of male Kurdish life in Istanbul, as a form of communicative labor through which a distinct historical consciousness and shared understandings of violence are created, networks for survival and dignity engendered, and moral selves crafted. These narratives refuse interpretation of the ongoing Kurdish struggle as mere terrorism or victimhood and instead recuperate Kurdish agency and counterviolence. In these narratives, “defense of the community” not only asserts peoples’ right to exist but also charges just violence with moral significance, turning those who protect their community against state violence into aspirational figures. [violence, narrative, morality, war and peace, memory, Kurds, Turkey].
AB - In this article, I draw on two years of ethnographic research to explore the multiple and contradictory ways Kurdish working-class men in Istanbul imagine, narrate, and conceptualize violence. How Kurdish workers remember and publicly speak of violence, self-defense, and retribution has notably changed in the context of the resurgence of the war between the Turkish state and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK). I came to understand this storytelling of violence, omnipresent in all the social infrastructures of male Kurdish life in Istanbul, as a form of communicative labor through which a distinct historical consciousness and shared understandings of violence are created, networks for survival and dignity engendered, and moral selves crafted. These narratives refuse interpretation of the ongoing Kurdish struggle as mere terrorism or victimhood and instead recuperate Kurdish agency and counterviolence. In these narratives, “defense of the community” not only asserts peoples’ right to exist but also charges just violence with moral significance, turning those who protect their community against state violence into aspirational figures. [violence, narrative, morality, war and peace, memory, Kurds, Turkey].
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071071355&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071071355&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/aman.13244
DO - 10.1111/aman.13244
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85071071355
SN - 1548-1433
VL - 121
SP - 554
EP - 567
JO - American Anthropologist
JF - American Anthropologist
IS - 3
ER -