TY - JOUR
T1 - In for a penny, in for a pound
T2 - examining motivated memory through the lens of retrieved context models
AU - Talmi, Deborah
AU - Kavaliauskaite, Deimante
AU - Daw, Nathaniel D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Talmi et al.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - When people encounter items that they believe will help them gain reward, they later remember them better than others. A recent model of emotional memory, the emotional context maintenance and retrieval model (eCMR), predicts that these effects would be stronger when stimuli that predict high and low reward can compete with each other during both encoding and retrieval. We tested this prediction in two experiments. Participants were promised £1 for remembering some pictures, but only a few pence for remembering others. Their recall of the content of the pictures they saw was tested after 1 min and, in experiment 2, also after 24 h. Memory at the immediate test showed effects of list composition. Recall of stimuli that predicted high reward was greater than of stimuli that predicted lower reward, but only when high- and low-reward items were studied and recalled together, not when they were studied and recalled separately. More high-reward items in mixed lists were forgotten over a 24-h retention interval compared with items studied in other conditions, but reward did not modulate the forgetting rate, a null effect that should be replicated in a larger sample. These results confirm eCMR's predictions, although further research is required to compare that model against alternatives.
AB - When people encounter items that they believe will help them gain reward, they later remember them better than others. A recent model of emotional memory, the emotional context maintenance and retrieval model (eCMR), predicts that these effects would be stronger when stimuli that predict high and low reward can compete with each other during both encoding and retrieval. We tested this prediction in two experiments. Participants were promised £1 for remembering some pictures, but only a few pence for remembering others. Their recall of the content of the pictures they saw was tested after 1 min and, in experiment 2, also after 24 h. Memory at the immediate test showed effects of list composition. Recall of stimuli that predicted high reward was greater than of stimuli that predicted lower reward, but only when high- and low-reward items were studied and recalled together, not when they were studied and recalled separately. More high-reward items in mixed lists were forgotten over a 24-h retention interval compared with items studied in other conditions, but reward did not modulate the forgetting rate, a null effect that should be replicated in a larger sample. These results confirm eCMR's predictions, although further research is required to compare that model against alternatives.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120170782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120170782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1101/lm.053470.121
DO - 10.1101/lm.053470.121
M3 - Article
C2 - 34782403
AN - SCOPUS:85120170782
SN - 1072-0502
VL - 28
SP - 445
EP - 456
JO - Learning and Memory
JF - Learning and Memory
IS - 12
ER -