In defense of DW-NOMINATE

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Several of the articles in this volume criticize the use of DW-NOMINATE in historical work in American politics and suggest alternative approaches to the use of roll call voting data. While many of criticisms are certainly valid, their practical implications are often overstated. Moreover, the suggested alternatives are either impractical for most historically oriented scholars and or do not adequately address the underlying problems. Almost all of the criticisms can be addressed by correct application of DW-NOMINATE results or those of other closely related measures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)172-184
Number of pages13
JournalStudies in American Political Development
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In defense of DW-NOMINATE'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this